Sexual assault by IMF socialist chief leaves France in crisis

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the head of the corrupt International Monetary Fund and a contender for the 2012 presidential election in France against Nicolas Sarkozy, not to mention a full time socialist pig, decided to have some fun in New York City over the weekend after sexually assaulting a maid at the hotel he was staying at. For the time being, he is being held at Riker’s Island.

France is now in a crisis, as Kahn was the leading candidate to defeat Sarkozy. But now, many of his supporters have started to loose confidence and the international community is demanding for his immediate removal as the chief of the IMF.

Some supporters of the French Socialist Party, quite a few actually, believe that this was nothing more than set up by Sarkozy himself. But other supporters of Sarkozy are quick to point out that Kahn’s arrest only helps Sarkozy marginally.

Of course in France, it seems that Kahn’s perverted behavior is usually acceptable.

For some strange reason, the press decided to ask House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi about the arrest of Kahn, presumably because Pelosi is the queen of the American Socialist Party and responded “What a shame, at a time when the IMF is at the center stage at what is happening in Europe, Greece, etc., and the world financially, to have this disruption and I know they moved immediately to put someone in his place and it gives new definition to moral hazard. But it is so unfortunate and I feel really sad for the victim.”

Seriously Ms. Pelosi?

At this time, nobody seems to know anything about the victim that was attacked in the New York hotel, but one would think Pelosi would be supporting the Socialist himself because he represents everything Pelosi stands for. I wonder what Pelosi’s reaction would have been if the hotel maid was indeed raped and impregnated by Kahn? Just curious about her support for abortion…

More importantly, why is the press even interested in what Pelosi has to say on this issue? The woman is beyond irrelevant.

In all, if Kahn drops out of the election in France, the socialist people can more than likely expect Sarkozy as a shoe-in.

Liberal Hypocrisy 101

Yesterday during President Obama's budget speech, which was nothing more than total boredom, specifically he made an attempt to address the nation's long term debt problems... the tune of nearly $15 trillion that is. His speech was so far-left leaning, that apparently it seemed as though it put Vice President Joe Biden asleep.

When it came to Obama criticizing Republican lawmakers for refusing to raise taxes, one of the comments that President Obama said was "those who benefited most from our way of life can afford to give a little bit more... I don't need another cut tax cut and Warren Buffett doesn't need another tax cut."

Now let's analyze the President's comments for a moment. He wants to raise taxes on the wealthy people in this country because they can afford to give a little bit more. Radio talk show host Michael Savage made a good point yesterday which is this: Let's say Congress imposed a 100% tax on the rich and we take away all earnings of $250,000 and above, this tax would net about $1.4 trillion. The end result is that would fund the federal government for a couple of months.

Did you also know that if Congress were to take the profits of every single Fortune 500 corporation in America which is roughly the tune of more than $400 billion and allocate those funds into the federal government, it would also only last a couple of months? So let's tax the major corporations and the wealthy people, and that money will be gone in just a few months. I rest my case.

So if the super rich in this country can't save us, then what is President Obama's real agenda? Anti-capitalism? Destroy a free-market economy? I guess so. 

By the way, General Electric, didn't pay any income tax this last fiscal year. Should I also mention that Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of GE is on President Obama's economic advisory board, and GE also owns the Obama cheerleading news channel MSNBC? Conflict of interest? Deal with the devil? Again, I rest my case.

But President Obama's hypocrisy and flat out ignorance doesn't stop there. His liberal and socialist philosophy is this ambition that the wealthy should support the programs in the Federal Government, and in turn support the welfare and the social rejects in this country. Not once did he acknowledge and give credit where credit is due, which is the billions of dollars tax payers have to shove out of their hard earned money to compensate for the benefits of illegal aliens. California alone pays nearly $10 billion a year in the cost of illegal immigration, something that has drastically destroyed the State's economy and without a doubt, has no chance of recovery. But I suppose in President Obama's book, compensating for illegal aliens, is the generous form of socialism.

Furthermore, President Obama has failed to show any sympathy or consideration towards my generation and the generations of people to follow who will be inheriting this massive debt caused by both he and former President George W. Bush.

On March 20th, 2006, then Senator Obama stated "The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies. … Increasing America’s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that the buck stops here. Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better."

Yes, we deserve better. And raising the debt limit? Isn't that exactly what Obama's little weasel of a Treasury Secretary is trying to do as we speak? 

So just five years ago, Obama showed remorse towards my generation over the country's reckless spending under Bush and a then-Republican controlled Congress, but totally refuses to acknowledge the reckless spending under his reign over the last two years and a Congress presided under Nancy Pelosi, who couldn't even pass the damn budget when it came due in September!

By the way, Mrs. Pelosi thinks "elections shouldn't matter as much as they do."  Moammar Gaddafi would be so proud, I'm sure. After all, Libya doesn't have any elections!


In the end, I really wish President Obama would have just come clean and admit to his anti-American stance. Please Mr. President, just say that the country is screwed and there is no way out. Not through higher taxes and not through the massive spending. You people in Washington can't even strike a balance between either of the two, much less address the problems alone. 


It is really getting pretty old, having to hear the constant hypocrisy and failing to address the issues this country is facing, and President Obama is simply embarrassing this country on every single point. Right now the United States is like the Titanic. We've already hit the iceberg and we're slowly sinking, but Obama is standing up there in the ship's bridge smiling and saying "its unsinkable!" 


Oh well! Tomorrow, lets see if we can survive in the frigid icy waters.





 

112th Congress convenes with Boehner as Speaker

As the 112th United States Congress resumed today, Republican lawmakers cheered as Ohio Congressman John Boehner filled the post as the new Speaker of the House, replacing Democrat Nancy Pelosi, who proved herself worthy as perhaps the worst House Speaker this country has ever had. Under her reign over two years of the Bush Administration and two years of the Obama Administration, Congress has for the most part achieved nothing, except for play rubber stamps and continue to spend money into oblivion, thus moving this country to the brink of near bankruptcy.

So with Mr. Boehner as Speaker, Americans are trying to appear optimistic and hope for a sense of real change that Congress can finally move forward and actually get work done.

But it appears that a blood bath is already lying ahead. Republican leaders are already vowing to repeal Obama's controversial Health Care Law and are wanting to investigate the Obama Administration's rather unethical efforts in the last two years. Of course, I sincerely doubt that Republicans will be successful in repealing the Health Care Law, because the Senate is still controlled by the Democrats and President Obama can always veto the bill and they don't have the necessary 2/3rds majority to override a veto by the President.

Nonetheless, I would give Republican lawmakers a great deal of credit if they do move forward on attempting to repeal the law. The bill is largely unfavorable among most Americans and they simply cannot afford it. Personally, I would have supported a public option but not a mandate that every American has to buy health insurance. It is obvious that there are some provisions in the bill that are good and some that are clearly bad.

But Americans are hoping the top priority of the new 112th Congress will be fixing the economy and many of them are not looking forward to more of the same political bickering among Democrats and Republicans. They want wasteful government spending cut and more transparency in their government, something that both now-former Speaker Pelosi and President Obama failed to fulfill in the last two years.

There will be some new changes in the Congress when it does come to transparency in government. For example, Congressman Ron Paul will be chairing the House Monetary Policy Committee and will most likely have stronger oversight and a chance to audit the Federal Reserve, which is something people have been waiting far too long for.

Here's to a new year in American politics.

Hopefully this year, work will be done for once.

President Obama ready to sign tax cuts

In what became a massive bipartisan effort, the House of Representatives approved on a vote of 277-148, to extend the Bush tax cuts, and will be signed into law by President Obama.

Congressman Anthony Weiner, who vigorously opposed the compromise, said "Republicans are better poker players than Obama"

Finally getting the hint Congressman Weiner? Its all a poker game.
You recall that just about every single Democrat on Capitol Hill were whining, moaning and complaining that President Obama was a traitor to side with the Republicans compromise on extending the tax cuts for all families, renew unemployment benefits and another year cut to Social Security taxes. Like Congressman Weiner, just about every other Democrat from the Speaker Nancy Pelosi, to Barney Frank, wanted to see it fail, because they claimed it would only favor tax cuts to the most wealthy Americans.

But that wasn't the case, thankfully. The President and the majority of Congress saw that this would be the best interest in the American people.

Maybe the only smartest thing they've done all year.

Congress sucks!

Don't take my word for it. Take a look at a recent Gallup poll. Only 13% of Americans actually approve of our U.S. Congress. Kind of makes you wonder what exactly is going on in the heads of that 13%.

This is the lowest approval rating in 30 years, according to the Gallup poll.

But just take a look at Congress' track record over the last several years, whether its the House or the Senate. When the Democrats took control of both houses in 2006, they complained about how pathetic and horrible President Bush was, yet the freeloading deer-trapped-in-headlights Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi did nothing to enforce impeachment proceedings against him, even though she vowed to have "the most honest, most ethical and transparent Congress in our nation's history..."

How did that work out for you Madam Speaker? Virtually no transparency has existed.

This is the same Congress that did nothing in preventing the financial collapse of 2008. Many of the problems with financial and insurance institutions on Wall Street, the failure of the Securities and Exchange Commission to regulate and government sponsored lending entities including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which were sinking into bankruptcy, were all under the watch of Congressman Barney Frank and Senator Chris Dodd.

This is also the same Congress that has for the most part been entirely ignoring the American people for the better part of two years, for the fact that they've been playing rubber stamps of President Obama's radical agenda. Some of the critical issues this last year included Arizona's new immigration law. Congress publicly criticized it, favored Mexican President Felipe Calderon's opposition of our laws and allowed Attorney General Eric Holder to sue Arizona, even though many of the leading polls showed that between 60% and 70% of Americans were supporting Arizona's law. Another critical issue involved Americans largely opposing the Health Care Law, yet Congress went ahead with it and jammed it down everyone's throat, without even looking at all of the major provisions.

Just like what Congressman John Conyers admitted. "We don't read the bills, it would take up too much time and delay the process..."

In another point of drama this year, Senator Lindsay Graham says we should invade Iran and overthrow that country's entire government. Yet while he has a point with relation to the dangers Iran could pose to the U.S. and Israel in particular, is that something we need at this very moment? I'm not questioning Iran's nuclear ambitions that it has to whip Israel off the face of the Earth, or that it has developed a relationship with Venezuela and North Korea, but Senator Graham seems to be oblivious to the fact that China has nuclear weapons, so does Pakistan and India. Hell, we have enough nuclear weapons to blow up the entire world!

My point being, the U.S. has enough problems right at home. A $14 trillion national debt, about $115 trillion in unfunded federal financial obligations, unemployment just a point under 10%, jobs being outsourced, people loosing their homes and a Federal Reserve that prints money out of thin air. Congress sits up on Capitol Hill and twiddles their thumbs on the DREAM Act, Don't Ask, Don't Tell and the Bush Tax Cuts, yet its time to get to the core of our problems.

A clown like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can wait.

It just goes to show how incompetent and unrepresentable our Congress has been over the last several years. No wonder why its fallen to an all time low. Some have even argued that if the approval rating of Congress even matters?

Well it should if they're the ones we're paying to represent us. Oh, I forgot, they don't represent us, they're owned by the global elites, major corporations and special interest groups.

Pelosi kept on as Democratic House Leader?

Before Republicans took back control of the U.S. House of Representatives, there was substantial discussion among both Republicans and Democrats in Congress that they wanted to remove House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, regardless of either party winning the majority.

Now that John Boehner has taken over her job, many in America can have at least a sigh of relief that we no longer have to listen to her anymore. But now that does not seem to be the case.

What has become a surprising turn of events is that House Democrats are now defending Nancy Pelosi and have decided to keep her on as the Democratic House Minority Leader when the new Congress resumes in January. Looks like the American people will still have to put up with the same horrible grinning mouth, and those eyes that look like a deer trapped in headlights, and refusing to move the hell out of the way.

Mrs. Pelosi has probably been the most ineffective Speaker of the House that this country has ever had. For someone who is to have a dialogue on behalf of Congress, the very people representing America, she demonstrated having possibility the worst communication skills of any high ranking politician in this country, maybe with the exception of President Bush after her party took over in 2007. This is the same Nancy Pelosi, by the way, who said at that time to “intend to have the most honest, most open and most ethical Congress in history.” Do any of the House Democrats remember this crap that was spewed then?

It is quite apparent that this Congress has had little honest, open or ethical qualities. The Congress did nothing in the last few years of the Bush Administration, and allowed policies which lead quickly to the financial disaster of 2008, and basically acted as a bunch of sock puppets for the Obama Administration, refused to listen to a majority of Americans that disapproved of this Administration’s policies, and speaking of ethics, Mrs. Pelosi seems to be entirely in defense of Congressman Charlie Rangel.

It would really be interesting to ask why Democrats kept her on as their supreme leader and what is the motive? Despite all of the criticism and disapproval of many Americans, you would think they could elect at least a Democrat that knows how to speak fluently and effectively, someone like Dennis Kucinich, who is not a rubberstamp like most of the other members of Congress.

But that was not the case. Instead, Democrats raced to her aid and recycled her into their ‘old/new’ Minority Leader. Oh my, do I feel sorry for House Democrats…

Election Results: Some good, some bad

There is absolutely no question that this was a difficult midterm election, and it appeared that Republicans took back the U.S. House of Representatives now holding 239, with 185 held by the Democrats. House Minority Leader John Boehner is anticipating taking over as Speaker of the House from Nancy Pelosi, and that is a blessing in disguise. Pelosi's position as Speaker has probably been more embarassing than some of the things Sarah Palin has said, and Democrats even said that if they were to continue to control of Congress, they would have replaced Pelosi as well. She was beyond awful.

It is pretty clear that Americans all across the country voted out some of the long time incumbents within the House, but that was not the case in the U.S. Senate with Democrats holding on 51 seats, compared to 46 seats held by Republicans. Some of the tea-party favorites such as Florida Republican Senate candidate Marco Rubio defeated his main opponent, Florida Governor Charlie Crist, who was running as an Independent. Rand Paul defeated Jack Conway by a landslide in Kentucky. Some of the others such as Christine O'Donnell, another tea-party favorite, pretty much cut her own throat, and was defeated by Democrat Chris Coons for the Delaware Senate.

In a surprising turn of events, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid came back and defeated tea-party favorite Sharron Angle for Nevada, at was seems to be virtually at the last minute. Other U.S. Senators that held their seats included Incumbent Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona, in a very disappointing election in California, voters decided to re-elect Incumbent Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer, who really needs to just retire.

Now that Republicans have taken control of the House, Americans are skeptical, but anticipating, that they will stop the bleeding spending on the federal level. Already, Speaker-elect, John Boehner has entertained the notion of repealing President Obama's controversial Healthcare Reform Bill, but if that is the case, President Obama could always veto the decision, unless Congress could overturn any veto by a 2/3 majority.
We'll see.

The truth of the matter is, while this midterm has certainly sent a message across the nation and to Washington concerning the nation's concern with massive spending and governmental control, there will also be a greater sense of divisiveness in terms of actually getting progress done through Congress. It is fair to say that the Republicans are going to try to cut the federal spending, which is in itself good, but I sincerely doubt there will be any "compromise" between the now Republican controlled House, with the Senate and President Obama.

The coming months all the way to the 2012 election, will display a very interesting slate of events.