Pelosi kept on as Democratic House Leader?

Before Republicans took back control of the U.S. House of Representatives, there was substantial discussion among both Republicans and Democrats in Congress that they wanted to remove House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, regardless of either party winning the majority.

Now that John Boehner has taken over her job, many in America can have at least a sigh of relief that we no longer have to listen to her anymore. But now that does not seem to be the case.

What has become a surprising turn of events is that House Democrats are now defending Nancy Pelosi and have decided to keep her on as the Democratic House Minority Leader when the new Congress resumes in January. Looks like the American people will still have to put up with the same horrible grinning mouth, and those eyes that look like a deer trapped in headlights, and refusing to move the hell out of the way.

Mrs. Pelosi has probably been the most ineffective Speaker of the House that this country has ever had. For someone who is to have a dialogue on behalf of Congress, the very people representing America, she demonstrated having possibility the worst communication skills of any high ranking politician in this country, maybe with the exception of President Bush after her party took over in 2007. This is the same Nancy Pelosi, by the way, who said at that time to “intend to have the most honest, most open and most ethical Congress in history.” Do any of the House Democrats remember this crap that was spewed then?

It is quite apparent that this Congress has had little honest, open or ethical qualities. The Congress did nothing in the last few years of the Bush Administration, and allowed policies which lead quickly to the financial disaster of 2008, and basically acted as a bunch of sock puppets for the Obama Administration, refused to listen to a majority of Americans that disapproved of this Administration’s policies, and speaking of ethics, Mrs. Pelosi seems to be entirely in defense of Congressman Charlie Rangel.

It would really be interesting to ask why Democrats kept her on as their supreme leader and what is the motive? Despite all of the criticism and disapproval of many Americans, you would think they could elect at least a Democrat that knows how to speak fluently and effectively, someone like Dennis Kucinich, who is not a rubberstamp like most of the other members of Congress.

But that was not the case. Instead, Democrats raced to her aid and recycled her into their ‘old/new’ Minority Leader. Oh my, do I feel sorry for House Democrats…

Election Results: Some good, some bad

There is absolutely no question that this was a difficult midterm election, and it appeared that Republicans took back the U.S. House of Representatives now holding 239, with 185 held by the Democrats. House Minority Leader John Boehner is anticipating taking over as Speaker of the House from Nancy Pelosi, and that is a blessing in disguise. Pelosi's position as Speaker has probably been more embarassing than some of the things Sarah Palin has said, and Democrats even said that if they were to continue to control of Congress, they would have replaced Pelosi as well. She was beyond awful.

It is pretty clear that Americans all across the country voted out some of the long time incumbents within the House, but that was not the case in the U.S. Senate with Democrats holding on 51 seats, compared to 46 seats held by Republicans. Some of the tea-party favorites such as Florida Republican Senate candidate Marco Rubio defeated his main opponent, Florida Governor Charlie Crist, who was running as an Independent. Rand Paul defeated Jack Conway by a landslide in Kentucky. Some of the others such as Christine O'Donnell, another tea-party favorite, pretty much cut her own throat, and was defeated by Democrat Chris Coons for the Delaware Senate.

In a surprising turn of events, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid came back and defeated tea-party favorite Sharron Angle for Nevada, at was seems to be virtually at the last minute. Other U.S. Senators that held their seats included Incumbent Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona, in a very disappointing election in California, voters decided to re-elect Incumbent Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer, who really needs to just retire.

Now that Republicans have taken control of the House, Americans are skeptical, but anticipating, that they will stop the bleeding spending on the federal level. Already, Speaker-elect, John Boehner has entertained the notion of repealing President Obama's controversial Healthcare Reform Bill, but if that is the case, President Obama could always veto the decision, unless Congress could overturn any veto by a 2/3 majority.
We'll see.

The truth of the matter is, while this midterm has certainly sent a message across the nation and to Washington concerning the nation's concern with massive spending and governmental control, there will also be a greater sense of divisiveness in terms of actually getting progress done through Congress. It is fair to say that the Republicans are going to try to cut the federal spending, which is in itself good, but I sincerely doubt there will be any "compromise" between the now Republican controlled House, with the Senate and President Obama.

The coming months all the way to the 2012 election, will display a very interesting slate of events.