Hugo Chavez, the self important clown of Venezuela, says that he has proposed a plan to the Arab League which detailed "resolving the unrest" in Libya.
Just what we need in this world, another dictator reaching out to help another dictator.
Reuters reported today that Chavez's plan was to work with an international commission on working with Moammar Gaddafi on restoring Libya. Like Iran, Libya has had a productive working relationship with Chavez. But the details of Chavez's so-called "turnaround plan" offered no precise details as to what would be proposed. It seems apparent that Chavez is wanting to work with Gaddafi perhaps due to oil. Anyone with a triple digit IQ knows that Chavez has no real commitment to restoring peace in any country, he is just about as brutal as Gaddafi.
Critics are already calling Chavez's plan as nothing more than offering Gaddafi "an easy way out of power". Meanwhile Chavez has been criticizing Washington as "exaggerating reports of repression" of his pal Gaddafi, simply as a way for the U.S. to possibly invade that country.
Noting Chavez's participation with Iran on uranium enrichment, it seems logical to conclude that Chavez probably wants some kind of consideration from Libya. Again, could it be oil? Working in the future to develop nuclear programs? Offering subsidies for terrorist groups?
At this point, Chavez's plan is simply under consideration, but at this point Gaddafi is in dire need of any support he can muster. Even if it is from another horrible individual. Sort of like evil meets evil.
Showing posts with label middle east upheaval. Show all posts
Showing posts with label middle east upheaval. Show all posts
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Friday, February 25, 2011
Obama ignorance is shocking
As the United States and the rest of the world apparently continues to poor gasoline all over the place and set themselves on fire, President Obama has decided to celebrate by bringing Motown to the White House as a tribute to Black History Month. Simply unbelievable.
I honestly think Obama's ignorance and his contradictions are just about as worse as the Bush Administration, hence Obama's nickname "President Extension of George W. Bush".
Shortly after the upheaval began in the Middle East, particularly in Egypt, all President Obama did for an entire week and a half is demand that President Mubarak must resign, never mind the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood was helping provoke the unrest in the first place, and never mind the fact that Egypt helped keep the peace with Israel, something that the Muslim Brotherhood has wanted to destroy for quite some time.
Yet on Wednesday during his press conference, President Obama addressed the unrest in Libya for the first time in almost nine days since it began. In his speech, he refused to even ask for Gaddafi to resign, let alone even mention his name. He also seemed to completely ignore the fact that the spiritual cleric of the Muslim Brotherhood, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, called for the assassination of Gaddafi and acknowledged that it will be the primary focus of the Muslim Brotherhood to continue to destabilize the Middle East and whip out Israel.
Why is President Obama reluctant to acknowledge the Muslim Brotherhood's plans and why is he forgetting all about Gaddafi, when Gaddafi himself also has deep resentment against Israel and is an even worse dictator than Mubarak was?
In addition to completely ignoring the facts in the Middle East, President Obama is all about standing with the unions today, after the Wisconsin Assembly passed a bill that would break union rights, to help pass Wisconsin's budget. If anything, that should be a plus. It is about time that someone in the political spectrum finally woke up and realized that unions are one of the primary reasons why States all across America are in critical financial condition. Maybe if he actually understood facts, the President would call for union reform.
This President has not even made an effort to keep any of his so called campaign promises on "hope and change", its all about the status quo as far as he is concerned; continuously catering to the special interest groups and the far left socialist agenda.
Obviously we are living in a country that is no longer represented in a Democratic Republic and we probably don't even know what we stand for anymore in this country. When you have a President like this that is completely out of touch with reality, you have to question the motive.
Perhaps he really is just ignorant. Or perhaps, he, like the rest of the Arab World, doesn't like Israel either.
I honestly think Obama's ignorance and his contradictions are just about as worse as the Bush Administration, hence Obama's nickname "President Extension of George W. Bush".
Shortly after the upheaval began in the Middle East, particularly in Egypt, all President Obama did for an entire week and a half is demand that President Mubarak must resign, never mind the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood was helping provoke the unrest in the first place, and never mind the fact that Egypt helped keep the peace with Israel, something that the Muslim Brotherhood has wanted to destroy for quite some time.
Yet on Wednesday during his press conference, President Obama addressed the unrest in Libya for the first time in almost nine days since it began. In his speech, he refused to even ask for Gaddafi to resign, let alone even mention his name. He also seemed to completely ignore the fact that the spiritual cleric of the Muslim Brotherhood, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, called for the assassination of Gaddafi and acknowledged that it will be the primary focus of the Muslim Brotherhood to continue to destabilize the Middle East and whip out Israel.
Why is President Obama reluctant to acknowledge the Muslim Brotherhood's plans and why is he forgetting all about Gaddafi, when Gaddafi himself also has deep resentment against Israel and is an even worse dictator than Mubarak was?
In addition to completely ignoring the facts in the Middle East, President Obama is all about standing with the unions today, after the Wisconsin Assembly passed a bill that would break union rights, to help pass Wisconsin's budget. If anything, that should be a plus. It is about time that someone in the political spectrum finally woke up and realized that unions are one of the primary reasons why States all across America are in critical financial condition. Maybe if he actually understood facts, the President would call for union reform.
This President has not even made an effort to keep any of his so called campaign promises on "hope and change", its all about the status quo as far as he is concerned; continuously catering to the special interest groups and the far left socialist agenda.
Obviously we are living in a country that is no longer represented in a Democratic Republic and we probably don't even know what we stand for anymore in this country. When you have a President like this that is completely out of touch with reality, you have to question the motive.
Perhaps he really is just ignorant. Or perhaps, he, like the rest of the Arab World, doesn't like Israel either.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Ahmadinejad: Unrest will spread to Europe and America
Well the head of the circus in the Middle East came out yesterday and said that the "wave of unrest that is happening in the Middle East is certain to spread to Europe and America."
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made the comments at the height of the protests in the entire region and has drawn criticism that his comments are derived from the belief that Shiite Muslims believe a ninth century hidden Imam will reappear.
Maybe 2012 really is the year the world will end, or maybe this really is the second coming of Christ, or some kind of rapture?
This is the same Ahmadinejad that spoke in front the United Nations assembly insisting that America was responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks and also that Iran is resisting a New World Order. Yet, in his comments, he is calling for a new system of world governance.
I guess he really has lost it.
Regardless, Ahmadinejad comments are unfortunately, somewhat correct. The protests that have been happening in the Middle East, are having impacts both in Europe and here in America. In Greece, Russia Today reported that over 60,000 people violently took to the streets attacking police officers. In Wisconsin, Governor Scott Walker is having a hell of a time balancing the budget and meeting the demands of greedy union workers, so much so that State Troopers are actually being dispatched to find missing State Representatives to return back to the capitol and put in their vote on balancing Wisconsin's budget.
To make matters worse, as the protests continue throughout the Middle East, it will unfortunately have dire consequences on the U.S. economy. Gas prices are starting to rise and when the cost of gas skyrockets, people seem to spend less, which means consumer products will most likely also start to rise, but the consumer demand for these products will start to decline, as they become too expensive for people to afford to purchase them.
There really is no way out of this mess we're in. Congress and State Legislatures will cut costs and raise taxes regardless, it will make no difference; the Muslim Brotherhood can continue to influence protesters and remove their sinister governments so they can establish a new order of government and remove Israel and finally, the United States, will probably, most likely, not be the United States anymore sometime down the road.
We only have the greedy self-serving international businessmen to thank for destroying our economic system
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made the comments at the height of the protests in the entire region and has drawn criticism that his comments are derived from the belief that Shiite Muslims believe a ninth century hidden Imam will reappear.
Maybe 2012 really is the year the world will end, or maybe this really is the second coming of Christ, or some kind of rapture?
This is the same Ahmadinejad that spoke in front the United Nations assembly insisting that America was responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks and also that Iran is resisting a New World Order. Yet, in his comments, he is calling for a new system of world governance.
I guess he really has lost it.
Regardless, Ahmadinejad comments are unfortunately, somewhat correct. The protests that have been happening in the Middle East, are having impacts both in Europe and here in America. In Greece, Russia Today reported that over 60,000 people violently took to the streets attacking police officers. In Wisconsin, Governor Scott Walker is having a hell of a time balancing the budget and meeting the demands of greedy union workers, so much so that State Troopers are actually being dispatched to find missing State Representatives to return back to the capitol and put in their vote on balancing Wisconsin's budget.
To make matters worse, as the protests continue throughout the Middle East, it will unfortunately have dire consequences on the U.S. economy. Gas prices are starting to rise and when the cost of gas skyrockets, people seem to spend less, which means consumer products will most likely also start to rise, but the consumer demand for these products will start to decline, as they become too expensive for people to afford to purchase them.
There really is no way out of this mess we're in. Congress and State Legislatures will cut costs and raise taxes regardless, it will make no difference; the Muslim Brotherhood can continue to influence protesters and remove their sinister governments so they can establish a new order of government and remove Israel and finally, the United States, will probably, most likely, not be the United States anymore sometime down the road.
We only have the greedy self-serving international businessmen to thank for destroying our economic system
Friday, February 11, 2011
Egypt President Mubarak resigns
Egypt announced the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak today, after thirty years of power and two weeks of violence upheaval from its people. Well, it seems the opposite was apparent. The military finally put the pressure on him, following even more angry protests that occurred yesterday, after Mubarak announced he would hand over some powers to his Vice President Omar Suleiman, but that he would not resign.
His resignation comes after thirty years of dictatorial control on his people. Yet on the same end, Mubarak has been a very powerful ally to the United States to protecting Israel from radical terrorist groups.
While the Egyptian people began to celebrate immediately upon handing power over to the military, to some, this would give confidence that they will prevent hostile intervention from the Muslim Brotherhood.
But there is still cause for concern. The Muslim Brotherhood could end up getting a majority support from the people of Egypt and this would be catastrophic for the Middle East, as many of the protesters that wanted Mubarak to step aside, seem to be the ones supporting the Muslim Brotherhood.
The resignation of President Mubarak will most likely send shock waves throughout the Middle East. With the case of the protests in Tunisia that ultimately forced the removal of its President Ben Ali, it spread like wild fire to Egypt. Now with Egypt out of the way, many other countries might also see more larger upheavals. Libya, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Iran.
If it spreads and the Muslim Brotherhood does end up getting support in these countries and carrying out its determination against Israel, the Middle East, well, might not be the Middle East anymore.
His resignation comes after thirty years of dictatorial control on his people. Yet on the same end, Mubarak has been a very powerful ally to the United States to protecting Israel from radical terrorist groups.
While the Egyptian people began to celebrate immediately upon handing power over to the military, to some, this would give confidence that they will prevent hostile intervention from the Muslim Brotherhood.
But there is still cause for concern. The Muslim Brotherhood could end up getting a majority support from the people of Egypt and this would be catastrophic for the Middle East, as many of the protesters that wanted Mubarak to step aside, seem to be the ones supporting the Muslim Brotherhood.
The resignation of President Mubarak will most likely send shock waves throughout the Middle East. With the case of the protests in Tunisia that ultimately forced the removal of its President Ben Ali, it spread like wild fire to Egypt. Now with Egypt out of the way, many other countries might also see more larger upheavals. Libya, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Iran.
If it spreads and the Muslim Brotherhood does end up getting support in these countries and carrying out its determination against Israel, the Middle East, well, might not be the Middle East anymore.
Friday, February 4, 2011
George Soros' false views on Egypt chaos
There is nothing more sickening when you happen to listen to a multi-billionaire spew some false conciliatory overture, when the real motives are already set in place.
Such is the case with billionaire George Soros, known for his philanthropy work, promoting socialist ideals and helping collapse the economies of countries including the United Kingdom and Thailand.
At the height of the "Day of Departure" protests in Egypt as hundreds of thousands of protesters call for the removal of President Mubarak, there is something else "brewing" in the middle of all this.
Since the uprising in the Middle East began last month, there have been some lingering questions as to why it is all of a sudden playing out now. One might say that the people in these countries simply were fed up with their dictatorial leaders and vowed to fight back, which is certainly true to some extent. There is no question that people in other countries grow tired of an unfair authoritarian rule.
In another perspective, there is the idea that this was orchestrated from the very beginning, and people like George Soros stand to receive a great deal of financial wealth if the Middle East continues its current decline.
Here's an interesting scenario that people are failing to address. Back in 2009, when the Iranian people protested for the removal of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, all President Obama said was "The Iranian people are the ones to choose who their leader is." Here, there was virtually no interference from the United States in a country that is slowly, but surely, becoming a real threat to the Middle East and not to mention, Ahmadinejad himself is a modern day Hitler.
Yet now, President Obama is all over Egypt, calling for the immediate resignation of President Mubarak and wants his current Vice President to take control of the country. Egypt on the other hand is telling the United States to "mind its own business".
They have a point.
The real threat again lies in the possibility of the Muslim Brotherhood getting into Egypt's government. This is why President Mubarak has refused to resign and why Egypt is telling the United States to back off.
How does all of this relate to George Soros? Yesterday, he had his own analysis of Egypt's situation, and when you read his work, it is meant to sound so caring and supportive of human rights... all you have to do is read between the lines:
"The Muslim Brotherhood's cooperation with Mohamed ElBaradei, the Nobel laureate who is seeking to run for president, is a hopeful sign that it intends to play a constructive role in a democratic political system. As regards contagion, it is more likely to endanger the enemies of the United States - Syria and Iran - than our allies, provided that they are willing to move out ahead of the avalanche."
Well there is the old saying of keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Mr. Soros is indicating that the Muslim Brotherhood has cooperation with a hopeful candidate to succeed President Mubarak, even though the Muslim Brotherhood has not formally endorsed ElBaradei. Should it also be mentioned that ElBaradei is familiar with Iran's nuclear program and has consistently indicated that Iran is not a threat? Even if ElBaradei was endorsed by the Muslim Brotherhood, what role would they have in influencing radical change throughout the Middle East?
Mr. Soros continued that "the main stumbling block is Israel. In reality, Israel has as much to gain from the spread of democracy in the Middle East as the United States has. But Israel is unlikely to recognize its own best interests because the change is too sudden and carries too many risks."
Really? What would Israel gain if Egypt's government was controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood? War with Lebanon or Iran? Slaughtering millions of Jews? His final theory seems to be aimed at replacing every single dictator in the Middle East with a new government, overshadowed by radical Islam.
It shouldn't hurt to say that Mr. Soros, like many internationalists on this planet have connections to investment bankers in the Middle East that have been financing terrorism including al-Qaeda.
It may sound somewhat conspiratorial, but Mr. Soros has always been abiding we always need a New World Order, and one of the ways to set the process of creating one, is by collapsing governments. Once a government is collapsed, some people stand to make a great deal of money off the pandemonium.
It would not surprise me if Mr. Soros carried this out.
Such is the case with billionaire George Soros, known for his philanthropy work, promoting socialist ideals and helping collapse the economies of countries including the United Kingdom and Thailand.
At the height of the "Day of Departure" protests in Egypt as hundreds of thousands of protesters call for the removal of President Mubarak, there is something else "brewing" in the middle of all this.
Since the uprising in the Middle East began last month, there have been some lingering questions as to why it is all of a sudden playing out now. One might say that the people in these countries simply were fed up with their dictatorial leaders and vowed to fight back, which is certainly true to some extent. There is no question that people in other countries grow tired of an unfair authoritarian rule.
In another perspective, there is the idea that this was orchestrated from the very beginning, and people like George Soros stand to receive a great deal of financial wealth if the Middle East continues its current decline.
Here's an interesting scenario that people are failing to address. Back in 2009, when the Iranian people protested for the removal of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, all President Obama said was "The Iranian people are the ones to choose who their leader is." Here, there was virtually no interference from the United States in a country that is slowly, but surely, becoming a real threat to the Middle East and not to mention, Ahmadinejad himself is a modern day Hitler.
Yet now, President Obama is all over Egypt, calling for the immediate resignation of President Mubarak and wants his current Vice President to take control of the country. Egypt on the other hand is telling the United States to "mind its own business".
They have a point.
The real threat again lies in the possibility of the Muslim Brotherhood getting into Egypt's government. This is why President Mubarak has refused to resign and why Egypt is telling the United States to back off.
How does all of this relate to George Soros? Yesterday, he had his own analysis of Egypt's situation, and when you read his work, it is meant to sound so caring and supportive of human rights... all you have to do is read between the lines:
"The Muslim Brotherhood's cooperation with Mohamed ElBaradei, the Nobel laureate who is seeking to run for president, is a hopeful sign that it intends to play a constructive role in a democratic political system. As regards contagion, it is more likely to endanger the enemies of the United States - Syria and Iran - than our allies, provided that they are willing to move out ahead of the avalanche."
Well there is the old saying of keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Mr. Soros is indicating that the Muslim Brotherhood has cooperation with a hopeful candidate to succeed President Mubarak, even though the Muslim Brotherhood has not formally endorsed ElBaradei. Should it also be mentioned that ElBaradei is familiar with Iran's nuclear program and has consistently indicated that Iran is not a threat? Even if ElBaradei was endorsed by the Muslim Brotherhood, what role would they have in influencing radical change throughout the Middle East?
Mr. Soros continued that "the main stumbling block is Israel. In reality, Israel has as much to gain from the spread of democracy in the Middle East as the United States has. But Israel is unlikely to recognize its own best interests because the change is too sudden and carries too many risks."
Really? What would Israel gain if Egypt's government was controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood? War with Lebanon or Iran? Slaughtering millions of Jews? His final theory seems to be aimed at replacing every single dictator in the Middle East with a new government, overshadowed by radical Islam.
It shouldn't hurt to say that Mr. Soros, like many internationalists on this planet have connections to investment bankers in the Middle East that have been financing terrorism including al-Qaeda.
It may sound somewhat conspiratorial, but Mr. Soros has always been abiding we always need a New World Order, and one of the ways to set the process of creating one, is by collapsing governments. Once a government is collapsed, some people stand to make a great deal of money off the pandemonium.
It would not surprise me if Mr. Soros carried this out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)